Now that we
had romance movies with vampires from 2008-2012, a romance movie with witches
in February of this year, a romance movie with zombies also in February of this
year, a romance movie with aliens in March of this year, and a mix of all of
these movies in August of this year, we now must have a romance movie with time
travel in November.
About Time is a new rom-com dramedy from
writer and director Richard Curtis about a young weak man who learns that he
has the ability of time travel and the tale of this life and how he uses it to
help him, but also the people around him, and how he deals with it throughout
his life while making many mistakes using it.
This film
stars Domhnall Gleeson and Rachel McAdams, who both do very well in their
roles. It is also has a supporting cast of Bill Nighy, Lydia Wilson, and
Lindsay Duncan. All three of them did well, but they were not phenomenal. All
of those supporting parts could have been played by anyone. I really do think
the primary actors owned their roles. The acting was still good.
The
screenplay, by Richard Curtis, attempted at many things. It tried to be very
funny, enjoyable, have good dialogue, be clever, and have heart. It
accomplished all of those things. It was a funny movie. It only really had one
gut-buster, but I laughed at most of the jokes. Some laughs were just chuckles,
but some of them I actually legitimately laughed at. Also, surprisingly, most
of the laughs were not cheesy. Some of the ones I actually laughed at were
cheesy, and there were cheesy lines that I did not laugh at. There were also
jokes that went too far or ones that were too repetitive that eventually made
fools out of themselves. It was enjoyable, but I will get more into that later.
What I mean by it had good dialogue is that there were times when someone would
say something that I thought was realistic, or someone would do something that I
thought was realistic. For most of the movie it did seem like this was written
in a script, but almost all movies are like that so that cannot really be a
negative. It did have unrealistic parts, but I let some of them slide because
this genre has claimed what it is through all of these movies. The way it was
clever is that the formula for time traveling and the limitations there are to
time traveling really added depth, and surprisingly, realism to the movie and
was one way that it was clever. Another way is that after a while it actually
did not explain everything to the audience. There are some things that they give
hints at and the audience has to figure out for themselves. It is very rare
that movies do that, and it was pulled off very well. That is another way that
the movie is clever. It succeeded at having heart because you actually like the
lead characters in this movie, so you care about them. Sometimes when it tried
to get to audience it did fail, but those were only a few times. Sadly, I also
have another negative for the writing. In the way that the story is told, it
does not pace itself incredibly well. For the most of the film it stays on a
constant story line, but at one point it starts skipping ahead by years. The
script was not paced incredibly well, so it was a little messy. But I still say
that the screenplay is very, very good.
I will reserve
a paragraph for the directing here. The directing is also done by writer of the
movie, Richard Curtis. I do not really think he should have directed this. I
think that he is a better writer and director. I think by the time production
had started of the film he wanted to change his vision. I think a different
director would have taken the screenplay and captured the vision of the
screenplay, if it was a good director. I will say that the film did not look
bad. Sometimes it did have some pretty bad green screen, though. For the most
part, the shots were not bad. But there was one scene in which people had a conversation
that would have been intense if it was handled nearly any other way, because it
switched between them so dramatically that it immediately became laughable. The
shots were both shots of their heads really close up. The way it was executed
was not very god. It seemed like a 10-year-old shot that scene. There was also
one scene where the camera guy was walking backwards while someone was walking
down the sidewalk, but the camera was shaking really bad. Overall the directing
was alright.
The story of
the movie, yet similar to recent movies, was actually fairly original. It was
well thought-out and executed. Even though some elements did not fit in quite
right, it all worked together. It was interesting and it was handled well. That
is why the story of this film was really good. The events in this film, while
mostly unpredictable, never had true “WOW!” moments. They did conjure some much
unexpected twists, but nothing big. The events were very good overall.
This movie
has to be enjoyable for everything to work. And I will say that I did enjoy
this movie. Though, the execution of the film also had pacing issues along with
the script. Because for the first hour or so, it paced itself well. But after
the first two acts of the film ended, it started to go up and down and up and
down. It kept on repeating its pattern, so the “up” moments were not as
enjoyable and they should have been, and the “down” moments got boring. So this
movie did have several dull moments. Another issue with the film is that it
seemed to have four or five acts. It changed its direction many times to the
point where it seemed messy. And, the film itself is a big messy. It is a bit
all over the place. Still, though, with these few twists it is enjoyable. The
story itself is interesting, and the main character himself is interesting. His
life is interesting. That is why the film is enjoyable. It is not quite very
enjoyable. It is very close to being really enjoyable, though.
About Time has good acting, very, very good
writing, a really good story, very good events, was enjoyable, and had alright
directing, but it did have some bad lines and some unrealistic lines, several
faults with the directing, and had pacing issues and seemed messy. This movie
is overall a really good movie.
I rate the
movie on my rating system “A good movie”.
Because of the pacing issues, it is not quite worth seeing at the theater, but
it is a really good rental.
On the grading rating system, I give it a B+. It barely got over a B.
On the out-of-10 rating system, I give About Time a 7.6/10.
On the grading rating system, I give it a B+. It barely got over a B.
On the out-of-10 rating system, I give About Time a 7.6/10.
No comments:
Post a Comment