In modern times,
few movies that come out are actually, truly, great films. Yes, there have been
films even this year that I have said are great movies. But among The Lego Movie, The Grand Budapest Hotel,
Captain America: The Winter Solider, X-Men: Days of Future Past, Edge ofTomorrow, Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, Guardians of the Galaxy, and Gone Girl, none are truly fantastic films. However, I do stand by my statement that
they are all great for their genre. What I believe to be a great movie in what
it goes for in its genre and a truly great film are two different things. Film
critic Roger Ebert had a very profound definition of a great film, and I
analyze that to be a film that goes beyond being a piece of entertainment and
into a study on something; a statement about something, perhaps. There was one
movie which came out earlier this year that I would consider a great film, and
that movie is Snowpiercer. Nightcrawler is also truly great film.
Louis Bloom
(Jake Gyllenhaal) is a thief who does many illegal things and earns money for a
living off of selling random things. He has no career and no real job. However,
he is a very smart man, maybe even a genius. And when he sees that people are
making money by finding events in which people are gravely hurt using a police
scanner and filming them to sell to the news, he takes that up and it leads him
down a dark path.
As I just
said, Bloom is an incredibly intelligent man. But he has some very odd views.
He thinks of life in a very straightforward, pro-or-con, way. When he decides
to do something, it is because it would affect him positively. When he is
thinking about doing something illegal or “morally wrong,” he does it if the
positives generated from it outweigh the risks of doing it. He doesn’t really
care about other people is does not show much emotion. He basically turns
everything into a mathematical equation.
This film
can offer many thrills to the audience, as it did to me, but the film is not
made specifically for its thrills, but it’s made as a character study on Louis
Bloom and a social commentary on several things. But I cannot go in-depth about
them, because they don’t really come into play until the very end of the movie,
and it’s easiest to discern them after viewing the movie. Since I would like
you to be able to experience these things yourself, I will not talk about my
analysis on the film’s themes. All I will say is that it gives you a possible
insight on media and some new ideas about how business really works and what
life can possibly be about. Does the movie condone some of the actions of its
main character? No. But the movie raises questions, and could thought to be
asking them itself, on the success of Bloom. Does the director/writer think
Bloom is smart or insane? That is for us, the audience to decide.
Many of the
moral punishments of the film are put on the audience to decide, and that is
reflected in the conclusion of the film. See, this isn’t quite a normal movie.
It does not have the same plot structure - beginning, middle, and end - that
most films do. The focus of Nightcrawler is not on its plot, but on its
character. And that is one of the things that make it a great film. Much of the
attention is given to Louis Bloom, and that is how the themes are entered into
the movie. The themes do remain subtle, but not so subtle that you need to view
the film six times to find out what one shot means.
As far as
the technical aspects behind the production of the movie go, we have all
positives. For one, Dan Gilroy does a very great job directing the movie. It
looks authentic and real with a great vision of the big city - especially at
night. Because he also wrote the film, he had a great idea about the social
commentary he wanted to put into it, so he could focus on the character and
create a dark tone that coincides with the messages. He also does a very good
job at using the camera to give us information. He has a unique style of
directing, and he is able to make every scene his own. Lastly, Gilroy creates
an even pace that retains throughout the entire movie.
Jake
Gyllenhaal gives a top-notch excellent performance, which is probably the best
of his career. He gives every single line as if he is the character, and after
a while, I started seeing the character more than I did the actor. Gyllenhaal
is able to sell every single scene and performances excellently under Gilroy’s
direction. He seems so natural in the movie that it’s almost shocking how good
he is at the start of the film. Although none of the performances are bad, Jake
Gyllenhaal’s leading one more-or-less carries the entire movie.
Last to
mention is the script. As I said earlier, because Dan Gilroy wrote and directed the film, he was able to
include his ideas in both the script and the direction. And the dialogue is
fantastic. It is so realistic, but also very original. The film does not create
its own boundaries, it just goes in. Gilroy uses his writing to make the movie
seem so real. The plot does not exactly move quickly, so there is not a bunch
of stuff going on all at once. The movie takes a lot of time to lock in its
themes that would later be expressed. And because of this, it seems so real
that when events take place near the end, it’s shocking to point of which it
seems like they are, actually, happening. With an unconventional plot, an
incredible main character, and excellent dialogue, a fantastic script is
created.
Nightcrawler
is definitely a great movie. It goes beyond being a piece of entertainment and
emerges into a piece of art. The direction, script, and lead performance work
together to create many ideas and introduce a social commentary. The only thing
I can really say is “wrong” with the film is that at some times it does meander
and some enjoyment was lost, but that’s it, and those times were rare due to Dan
Gilroy’s good pacing job. I loved Nightcrawler and urge anyway reading this to
go out and see the movie in theaters.
No comments:
Post a Comment